<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<source xmlns="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2"><about><source abbr="StanUniv">
		<abbr rgx="StanUniv">StanUniv</abbr>
		<desc>Mgri Stanislai de Znoyma Tractatus de universalibus realibus, <i>in:</i> J. Sedlák, M. Jan Hus, Praha 1915, pag. 81*–93*.</desc>
		<date>ante 1408</date>
		<ref target=""/>
	</source></about>
<entry lemma="aeque" position="14810" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">e-e perfidus sicut fidelis <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 82*</listBibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="aequivocus" position="15250" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">quia in e-is non est contradiccio, stat simul, quod non est tenendum, quod eadem substancia numeralis est Deus, homo et asinus <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 90*</listBibl>
          </cit></entry>
<entry lemma="animatus" position="36660" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">per genus et speciem videtur intelligere <hi rend="italics">(Moyses)</hi> generales et speciales quidditates, in quas et secundum quas a-a dixit esse producta <hi rend="italics">(cf. Vulg. gen. 1,20-21)</hi> <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 86*</listBibl>
          </cit></entry>
<entry lemma="appareo" position="44630" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> neque qualescunque a-es et pretense forme arguendi sylogistice vel alie infringunt hanc conclusionem <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 90*</listBibl>
              </cit></entry>
<entry lemma="complexe" position="153610" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">talis veritas, que est omnes et singulas creaturas esse sub potestate Dei, non est significabile c-e, quod esset solum equaliter esse et non esse, et non esset quidquam nec aliqua res alicuius infinite vel finite bonitatis, sicut plures conati sunt probare esse significabile c-e <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 82*</listBibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="diabolice" position="206830" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"><hi rend="italics"> al.</hi>;<hi rend="italics"> cf.:</hi> Anshelmus de incarnacione verbi cap. 3 <hi rend="italics">(cf. Patrologia Latina 158,265)</hi> ita ait: ...illi utique nostri temporis dyaletici, ymmo dya-e heretici...prorsus a spiritualium questionum disputacione sunt exsufflandi <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 87*</listBibl>.</cit></entry>
<entry lemma="dialecticus" position="207960" hom_nr=""><form xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2">dya- <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">UK III G 27 f.331r</listBibl>; dyalet- <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 87*</listBibl>; -et- <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">PrIeron 13</listBibl>
    </form></entry>
<entry lemma="dialogus" position="208080" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">Augustinus b. in dya-o ad Felicianum <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 87*</listBibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="dico" position="209910" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">volensque <hi rend="italics">(Deus)</hi> non solum secundum d-i, secundum racionem vel secundum conceptum esse ens <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 92*</listBibl>
          </cit></entry>
<entry lemma="dogmatizatio" position="221420" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">spes est, quod...sedes apostolica cito ammovebit tales conclusiones cum huiusmodi d-ibus ab ecclesia Dei...ideo contra tales d-es et conclusiones...arguitur...auctoritatibus <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 84*</listBibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="entitas" position="243250" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> videtur..., quod e-s eadem analoga sit Deus et omne ens <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 91*</listBibl></cit><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">si enim Deus et omnia alia conveniunt entitative, tunc in eadem communi e-e <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 91*</listBibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="entitative" position="243260" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">si enim Deus et omnia alia conveniunt e-e, tunc in eadem communi entitate <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 91*</listBibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="fides" position="278360" hom_nr="1"><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> Apostolus...dicit: Tito...secundum communem f-em gracia et pax etc. <hi rend="italics">(Vulg. Tit. 1,4)</hi>, ubi ponit communem f-em, qua credimus, quam Athanasius in symbolo vocat f-em catholicam, h. e. universalem, cum dicit: F-s...catholica est hec, ut unum Deum in trinitate...veneremur <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 87*</listBibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="incontradicibiliter" position="351140" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">dicit raciones pro hac sentencia introductas i-r probare universalia esse naturas simplices <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 88*</listBibl>.</cit></entry>
<entry lemma="indefinitus" position="353090" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> ubi...per indiff-am proposicionem fit locucio <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 91*</listBibl>
          </cit></entry>
<entry lemma="inexsistentia" position="356890" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> tali modo formalis inexi-e ponitur entitas formaliter inesse accidenti <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 92*</listBibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="integralis" position="371070" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> totum i-e dividitur in suas partes i-es <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 89*</listBibl>
              </cit><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">totum i-e non est quelibet pars sui i-is, sed totum universale est quelibet sui pars <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 89*</listBibl>.</cit></entry>
<entry lemma="interpello" position="373710" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">nonnulli...adeo sunt inflammati, ut...apud sedem apostolicam i-are conentur <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 81*</listBibl>
            </cit></entry>
<entry lemma="intrinsecus" position="375460" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> universalia sunt...principia cognoscendi et essendi i-a rerum <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">StanUniv 88*</listBibl>
              </cit></entry>
<entry lemma="nominalis" position="610440" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">Albertus Magnus...dicit raciones pro hac sentencia introductas...probare universalia esse naturas simplices et dicentes oppositum vocat n-es <bibl type="source">StanUniv 88*</bibl></cit></entry></source>