<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<source xmlns="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2"><about><source abbr="HusQuodlT">
		<abbr rgx="HusQuodlT">HusQuodlT</abbr>
		<desc>Mgri Ioannis Hus Quodlibet. Disputationis de quolibet Pragae in facultate artium mense Ianuario anni 1411 habitae enchiridion, <i>ed.</i> B. Ryba, CC-CM 211, Turnhout 2006 (impressio aucta et emendata).</desc>
		<date>1411</date>
		<ref target=""/>
	</source></about>
<entry lemma="namque" position="600370" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> fuit n-e vir ille ad viam virtutis ornamento compositus <bibl type="source">HusQuodlT 263</bibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="naturalis" position="602370" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">antecedens patet tam per n-es philosophos quam per mathematicos <bibl type="source">HusQuodlT 262</bibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="naturaliter" position="602380" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> omnis causa existens n-r prior suo effectu <bibl type="source">HusQuodlT 169</bibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="necessitas" position="603930" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> potencia racionalis...potest in utrumque contradictorium libere, igitur non de n-e alterum eligit <bibl type="source">HusQuodlT 53</bibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="negatio" position="604670" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> utrum n-es, pretericiones et futuriciones sint veritates. Arguitur, quod sic...In oppositum sic: n-es, pretericiones et futuriciones nec sunt substancie, nec accidencia; igitur non sunt veritates <bibl type="source">HusQuodlT 144</bibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="negative" position="604700" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">consequencia tenet n-e ab omnibus dividentibus ad divisum <bibl type="source">HusQuodlT 144</bibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="negativus" position="604710" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> illic Petrus de B. ...n-as veritates refutabat <bibl type="source">HusQuodlT 278</bibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="nego" position="604870" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> consequencia tenet a superiori n-ato ad inferius <bibl type="source">HusQuodlT 111</bibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="neuter" position="607080" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">si nullius partis contradiccionis Deus est n-r vel indifferens, omne quod eveniet, absolute necessario eveniet <bibl type="source">HusQuodlT 58</bibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="nobilitas" position="609320" hom_nr="1"><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> n-s morum <hi rend="italics">(cf. P ib. 53)</hi> est n-s simpliciter dicta; sed n-s ex genere est n-s secundum quid <hi rend="italics">(cf. P ib. 701,10)</hi> <bibl type="source">HusQuodlT 98</bibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="nocivus" position="609560" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">que <hi rend="italics">(nobilitas)</hi> maxime posses‹s›ionis videtur esse n-a <bibl type="source">HusQuodlT 100</bibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="nomen" position="610380" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">Deus est inmense intellectivus. Patet, quia cum Deus ex quid n-is sit optimum et sic primum ens, eius esse, cum...sit esse intellectivum, igitur est inmensum esse intellectivum <bibl type="source">HusQuodlT 16</bibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="nominalis" position="610440" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">substancia n-is cum qualitate suo nomine significatur per modum fontis stantis, ...ipse autem actus verbalis cum suo tempore...significatur per modum rivi fluentis <bibl type="source">HusQuodlT 10</bibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="nominatus" position="610520" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">prima et n-issima altitudo est distancia ultime spere, celi ultimi a centro terre <bibl type="source">HusQuodlT 76</bibl>.</cit></entry>
<entry lemma="notificatio" position="611890" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> post celorum n-em et astrorum...de pollicia sacerdotum est...disserendum <bibl type="source">HusQuodlT 114</bibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="nugatio" position="613680" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> Boecius: „Persona est racionalis nature individua substancia.“ ...Vel substancia stat ibi pro essencia, vel pro ypostati...Si pro ypostasi, contra: ypostasis, ut dicit Boecius, est „substancia individua“; ergo est ibi n-o <bibl type="source">HusQuodl 131 (<hi rend="italics">idem </hi>HusQuodlT 175, <hi rend="italics">ubi: </hi>negacio <hi rend="italics">per err.</hi>)</bibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="nullus" position="614080" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">Quod autem antecedens eiusdem consequencie potest esse verum sine consequente, patet ponendo casum, quod tu credas primo, quod aliquis homo decipitur, et sit rei veritas, quod n-us alius a te decipitur <bibl type="source">HusQuodlT 258</bibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="numerabilitas" position="614210" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">nec potest esse mensurabilitas penitus absque parvitate, n-s absque paucitate...Parvitas enim est per se materia mensurabilitatis, paucitas n-atis <bibl type="source">HusQuodlT 14</bibl>.</cit></entry>
<entry lemma="numeralis" position="614230" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> omnes res simul sunt unum intellectuale flumen...conpletum de omnibus rebus simul...Illud flumen est per se unum n-e primum, non alicuius simplicis vel aggregati generis predicamentalis, sed tocius generis entis dependentis. Patet, quia est per se indivisibiliter...pluribus individuis..., quorum quodlibet ipsum esset unum flumen; igitur est per se unum n-e <bibl type="source">HusQuodlT 25</bibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="numerus" position="614310" hom_nr="1"><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">nec cogites..., quod tam paucos in n-o posui <bibl type="source">HusQuodlT 283</bibl></cit></entry></source>