<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<source xmlns="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2"><about><source abbr="HusEff">
		<abbr rgx="HusEff">HusEff</abbr>
		<desc>Mgri Ioannis Hus De effectu indesinibili questio, <i>ed.</i> S. H. Thomson, Mediaevalia et Humanistica 7, 1952, pag. 79–82.</desc>
		<date>1408–1412 (?)</date>
		<ref target=""/>
	</source></about>
<entry lemma="adicio" position="10980" hom_nr=""><form xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2">add- <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">(1363) RegDipl VII 850</listBibl>; adii- <hi rend="italics">v. infra</hi>; adiac- <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">HusEff 80</listBibl>; adicto <hi rend="italics">(part. pf.)</hi> <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">(1375) DocAltov I 163</listBibl>
    </form></entry>
<entry lemma="analogos" position="33640" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> homo primo habet esse intelligibile in Deo, post factum esse in primo facto, scilicet ente anol-o, et tercio esse existere individuale <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">HusEff 80</listBibl>
          </cit></entry>
<entry lemma="caelum" position="95670" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">secundum regulam Aristotelis, que dicit primo C-i <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">HusEff 81</listBibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="desitio" position="204080" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">iuxta istud multiplex esse potest distingui multiplex incepcio, similiter d-o rei facte <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">HusEff 80</listBibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="effectualis" position="232370" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">quod produci est fieri de puro esse intelligibili et sic de nichilo in effectum ad esse e-e extra Deum <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">HusEff 80</listBibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="effectus" position="232420" hom_nr="1"><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">utrum possibile est produci e-um indesinibilem, ad cuius produccionem concurrit causa <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">HusEff 79</listBibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="ens" position="243010" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> tercium vero esse dicitur existencium in propria forma atque specie, verbi gracia quilibet homo primo habet esse intelligibile a Deo post factum esse in primo facto, scilicet e-e analogo <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">HusEff 80</listBibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="entitas" position="243250" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> ad quemlibet huiusmodi concurrit e-s analoga, que est causa efficiens <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">HusEff 82</listBibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="exsistentia" position="264000" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> questio duo querit. Primo, utrum possibile est produci effectum indesinibilem...Pro quesito primo noto, quod quamvis produci non potest diffiniri a priori..., potest tamen notificari sic, quod produci est fieri de puro esse intelligibili...Ista notificacio est bimembris. Prime parti correspondet primum fieri, et sic prima faccio, que est creacio, cum sit produccio ex puro esse intelligibili ad exi-am rei facte <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">HusEff 80</listBibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="exsisto" position="264010" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> antiqui Greci tria verba substantiva <hi rend="italics">(</hi>substancia <hi rend="italics">ed.)</hi> posuerunt, scilicet sum, fio, exi-o; quorum primum dixerant pure substantivum..., alia duo quodammodo mixta, id est aliqualiter adiectiva, eo quod omne factum esse adiacitur ipsi esse et omne exi-ere similiter tamquam posterius et fundatum ad suum inmutabile fundamentum <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">HusEff 80</listBibl>
          </cit></entry>
<entry lemma="finalis" position="280150" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> ad quemlibet <hi rend="italics">(sc. effectum)</hi> huiusmodi concurrit entitas analoga, que est causa efficiens, formalis et f-is per se cuiuslibet effectus secundarii <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">HusEff 82</listBibl>
                </cit></entry>
<entry lemma="fio" position="280540" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> esse existere individuale et huic dicto conformiter antiqui Greci tria verba substancia posuerunt, scilicet sum, fio, existo <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">HusEff 80</listBibl>
            </cit><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> prime parti correspondet primum f-i et sic prima faccio, que est creacio, cum sit produccio ex puro esse intelligibili ad existenciam rei facte <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">HusEff 80</listBibl>
          </cit></entry>
<entry lemma="gratificus" position="312390" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">in...virtutibus moralibus, quas consequitur esse g-um aput Deum <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">HusEff 80</listBibl>.</cit></entry>
<entry lemma="immutabiliter" position="342260" hom_nr=""><form xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2">inm- <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">PalAntih 79</listBibl>; inmot- <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">HusEff 80</listBibl></form></entry>
<entry lemma="incipiabilis" position="349140" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">incepcio fieret simpliciter de nichilo in aliquid...effectus i-is est effectus, qui potest habere factum esse, quod prius non habuit <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">HusEff 80</listBibl>.</cit></entry>
<entry lemma="indesinibilis" position="353490" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> effectus i-is, qui post factum esse non potest deficere a facto esse <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">HusEff 80</listBibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="intellegibilis" position="371350" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> produci est fieri de puro esse i-lligibili, et sic de nichilo, in effectum ad esse effectuale extra Deum <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">HusEff 80</listBibl></cit></entry></source>