<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<source xmlns="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2"><about><source abbr="BlLupDisp">
		<abbr rgx="BlLupDisp">BlLupDisp</abbr>
		<desc>Disputatio magistri Blasii Lupi contra magistrum Hieronymum de Praga in materia universalium realium cum responsionibus eiusdem, <i>edd</i>. F. Šmahel – G. Silagi, Magistri Hieronymi de Praga Quaestiones, polemica, epistulae, CC-CM 222, Turnhout 2010, pag. 103–137.</desc>
		<date>1409</date>
		<ref target=""/>
	</source></about>
<entry lemma="habitudo" position="317460" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> distincta...realiter et essencialiter, nisi sint suppositaliter unita vel alias yde‹m›ptificata, de se ipsis mutuo non predicantur, nisi secundum h-em aut causaliter vel secundum effectum <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">BlLupDisp 123</listBibl></cit></entry>
<entry lemma="molariter" position="480510" hom_nr=""><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example">ipsum A, cum sit universalis forma et multiplicabilis, sed non divisibilis m-r..., est tota in Sorte et tota in Platone <listBibl type="source" lb:index_as="source">BlLupDisp 128</listBibl>.</cit></entry>
<entry lemma="numerus" position="614310" hom_nr="1"><cit xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:lb="http://lb.ics.cas.cz/v2" type="example" lb:index_as="example"> universale cum singularibus non ponit in n-um, et sic non sunt eadem alicui tercio, quia sic forent eadem alicui tercio individuo, cum solum talia ad invicem ponunt in n-um <bibl type="source">BlLupDisp 111</bibl></cit></entry></source>